Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives June 13 2014
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Aleppo Pine and the sandspit, Sète --Christian Ferrer 04:44, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:57, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lahad Datu, Sabah: Gate to Guan Yin Temple. --Cccefalon 19:46, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vester Church, seen from South --Slaunger 19:01, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lisboa, Parque das Nações. Entrance to the Pavillion of Knowledge. -- Alvesgaspar 18:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bibliothèque Sainte-Geneviève, Paris (by Jastrow) --Paris 16 17:58, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC)<
-
- Nomination Opera house, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam --Poco a poco 17:57, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--ArildV 18:30, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination City hall, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam --Poco a poco 17:57, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Very good quality. --P e z i 20:49, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination American UH-1 Huey helicopter on the roof of the Reunification Palace, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam --Poco a poco 17:57, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 21:27, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Damaged car after storm in Mülheim an der Ruhr --Tuxyso 17:53, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Oops --Poco a poco 19:38, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Madrid, Basilica de San Francisco el Grande. Ceiling of the sacristy by José Marcelo Contreras -- Alvesgaspar 16:56, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trabrennbahn Krieau, stabling, 2nd district of Vienna --P e z i 16:47, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:44, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coromandel Marsh Dart Ceriagrion coromandelianum (male). --Joydeep 15:33, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice --Poco a poco 19:38, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from the warehouse in Rathenow, Brandenburg, Germany --A.Savin 12:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bilit, Sabah: Community meeting place --Cccefalon 12:44, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Capturing the yearlings: Wildpferdefang 2014, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmen, Germany --XRay 12:40, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:48, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ruins of a building in a Havanan corner. --Ivan2010 12:32, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Perspective issues. Poor categories --A.Savin 12:41, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nigella damascena --Berthold Werner 14:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:44, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trail in rainforest, Braulio Carrillo National Park, Heredia, Costa Rica (by Victor Quirós A) --Mvblair 11:20, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Not eligible for QIC. < 2MPix --Cccefalon 11:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sandakan, Sabah: HICOM Handalan II at Fire and Rescue Station Sandakan --Cccefalon 08:58, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, but I would remove the blurred birds (see note) --P e z i 09:30, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the hint. I will fix that asap. --Cccefalon 09:39, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Done --Cccefalon 19:58, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 319375 at Tulse Hill. Mattbuck 06:41, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:48, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sandakan, Sabah: Fire and Rescue Brigade at Balai Bomba Sandakan --Cccefalon 04:03, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, just curious, how do you arrange this kind of things over there? --Poco a poco 19:48, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Clematis 'H. F. Young' --Captain-tucker 00:17, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Not far from QI, but lacks some sharpness, sorry --Poco a poco 19:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dit nestje zit in de kleine vogelkijkhut in de Jan Durkspolder --Baykedevries 23:27, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Graphium 06:40, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Campus of the Vienna University of Economics and Business, Library and Learning Center --P e z i 22:38, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Some dustspots. I think, the sky could benefit from a partial denoising. Beside that: stunning photo, indeed. --Cccefalon 01:54, 10 June 2014 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded. --P e z i 09:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The bath-house, Vlakhernskoye-Kuzminki, Moscow --Max Ryazanov 22:23, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion I had reduced the magenta saturation a bit (lot of magenta in the branches) but anyway, it's QI. --Cccefalon 08:53, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination National park Lauwersmeer. Used to be sea. --Uberprutser 21:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. Nice details. :-) --XRay 12:43, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination TCG Cezayirli Gazi Hasan Paşa (A-579) --Chrumps 20:05, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Photo was obviously taken through a bull's-eye of another ship which beared outside water drops. The photo is heavily affected by those waterdrops. Also untilting was not done. No QI for me, sorry --Cccefalon 05:54, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Archaeological area of Cantona, Puebla, Mexico --Poco a poco 11:27, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Big parts appear too soft / blurred --A.Savin 11:03, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
New version (crop, tilt) Poco a poco 20:05, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rain water pond at Svenska Högarna. --ArildV 09:05, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Top left very blurry, perhaps wind blur? I'm not sure, but reducing the blurred area by another crop might help. --Cccefalon 09:33, 9 June 2014 (UTC) DOF are very limited here (taken with a 70-200mm lens), the trees are most likely just out of focus. Imo its not a problem, but I can try a new crop tonight.--ArildV 09:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, I am aware of the limitations of that lense. Before uploading the new crop, let me know, if it an impovement or not. I trust your judgement and I don't want to force a version, that is worse. --Cccefalon 09:56, 9 June 2014 (UTC) Thanks, I uploaded a new version with a small left crop. I think a bigger crop affects the composition too much. --ArildV 09:08, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, less dominant now. I think, it is a good compromise. --Cccefalon 09:44, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Archeological site of Alesia, in Alise-Sainte-Reine, Burgundy, France --Myrabella 08:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Nice but tilted cw and needs pespective correction Poco a poco 11:55, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
I have not much margins here for de-tilt and lens correction, but I will give a try. --Myrabella 13:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Done Better now? --Myrabella 16:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good enough --Poco a poco 20:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Archeological site of Alesia, in Alise-Sainte-Reine, Burgundy, France --Myrabella 08:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Western building of the Porta de Europa with the reflection of the eastern one, Madrid -- Alvesgaspar 21:16, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 12:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Transmitting station of the German Red Cross; Wildpferdefang 2014, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmen, Germany --XRay 08:58, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Blown parts and dust spots in the sky. --Kreuzschnabel 16:37, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Fixed Sorry. There were really a lot of dust spots. I've fixed it (and the blown parts).--XRay 05:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Support Much better, and you inflated it, too :-) --Kreuzschnabel 17:41, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Vincent church in Bielice --Jacek Halicki 22:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
Overexposed tower wall. --Siipikarja 07:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Vincent church in Bielice --Jacek Halicki 22:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
Parts of the wall are overexposed and thus details washed away. Too tight crop from the top. Building appears to be tilted to the right. The image would benefit from perspective correction. --Siipikarja 07:58, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Vincent church in Bielice --Jacek Halicki 22:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
Parts of the cross background wall are overexposed. --Siipikarja 08:07, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Pflersch valley in South Tyrol --Moroder 22:24, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 09:03, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Nice composition, huge resolution. The house in the middle and the mountain tops in the right are overexposed, but these are minor problems. --Siipikarja 08:28, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Route 11, Northern Chile --Till.niermann 08:39, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
What is the subject? the road (partially not visible) or the cactus (missing species)? --Poco a poco 18:30, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
The landscape with cactus and the truck providing a scale. --~~~~
Ok, then, I think it needs the species of the cactus, should be feasible Poco a poco 15:53, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Done. --Till.niermann 11:04, 9 June 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:26, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Route 11, Northern Chile --Till.niermann 08:39, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Pflersch Tribulaun peak (Elevation 3,097 m) from SW in spring in Pflersch in South Tyrol --Moroder 06:48, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Myrabella 19:36, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Lovely scenic shot. Nice composition. --Siipikarja 08:38, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination National Park Weerribben-Wieden. This dilapidated bridge does not employ more.--
Famberhorst 04:41, 6 June 2014 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. (Please add geo location.) --XRay 07:19, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Done Thank you.
Famberhorst 18:25, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination National Park Weerribben-Wieden. This dilapidated bridge does not employ more.--
-
- Nomination View from Gummer's How. Mattbuck 06:46, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 04:53, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Piccadilly Line train at Acton Town. Mattbuck 08:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok however the clouds are not far to be overexposed :) --Christian Ferrer 17:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former farmhouse "Mair" in Feldthurns in South Tyrol --Moroder 11:50, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion What is that in the bottom right corner of the image? -- KTC 11:58, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Done Fixed, thanks for the hint --Moroder 13:09, 6 June 2014 (UTC) Support I think it's ok --Christian Ferrer 04:50, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination University Park. Mattbuck 07:01, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose unsharp, for info lens flare in the middle and around the sun --Christian Ferrer 17:47, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination East Coast Main Line at Raskelf. Mattbuck 07:01, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:47, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140202 - Cartier vs Ralph Lauren --Pleclown 11:28, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose The crop and/or centring is a bit disturbing IMO --Christian Ferrer 12:09, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
What Christian said. --Siipikarja 12:37, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Organ of the Cathedral of Almudena, Madrid -- Alvesgaspar 18:08, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Noisy, CA, too contrasty. --Mattbuck 21:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC). Withdrawn, I will upload a better version. -- Alvesgaspar 18:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mugser Run, a small stream in Pennsylvania Jakec 12:21, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
A bit oversharpened? Mattbuck 23:10, 28 May 2014 (UTC) - Decline A bit. Also needs geocode.--Peulle 13:17, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
*Geocode added, but I'm not really sure how to reduce the sharpness (short of blurring, which is apparently a bad idea). Jakec 20:49, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
As Mattbuck said, the image is a bit oversharpened. --Siipikarja 12:35, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Nomination Mugser Run, a small stream in Pennsylvania Jakec 12:21, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Frieda-Noedl-Hof Tafel DSC 0569w.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Plaque at Frieda-Nödl-Hof, community residential building, Vienna --P e z i 21:09, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:21, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, but no way is this QI. It's very noisy --Mattbuck 21:43, 9 June 2014 (UTC) - Oppose As for Mattbuck. I don't know what happened here, but for ISO 250 the image shows way too much noise. Pushed brightness by several f-stops while raw converting? Looks more like ISO 2500... -- Smial 11:33, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination You are right, brightness was pushed too much. --P e z i 09:21, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Munsterkerk_Roermond_2014.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Munsterkerk (Roermond) --Tuxyso 10:58, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion Oppose Church is obscured by gazebo. Image slightly tilted.--Peulle 12:00, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, but this is no serious rationale for decline. The "gazebo" fits well into the ensemble. Let's discuss. --Tuxyso 12:13, 5 June 2014 (UTC) Yes, I still feel that since the church is the main feature of the image, it should be more prominent and not be obscured by an object in front. Second opinion needed, please.--Peulle 13:58, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Comment I don't see a quality issue besides the description which is essential component of the QI promotion. I will support with a more appropriate description and categorization --Moroder 18:11, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Done --Tuxyso 21:23, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Support Also the bandstand needs to be categorized imo since it's a main subject of the picture --Moroder 21:55, 5 June 2014 (UTC) - Support --Joydeep 08:03, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
File:London MMB «W6 Canary Wharf.jpg
[edit]File:NSG_Tannbüel-8495.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Lady's-slipper orchid (Cypripedium calceolus), Nature reserve Tannbüel, Bargen, canton of Schaffhausen, Switzerland --DKrieger 21:34, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Clipping yellow (details lost) --Iifar 06:17, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
New version from RAW --DKrieger 15:31, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Much better, but imo f/5 was not enough. --Iifar 18:09, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Örebro_på_cykel_(60).JPG
[edit]- Nomination Medborgarhuset. Community centre in Örebro, Sweden, built in 1957-65. Architects: Erik and Tore Ahlsén. --Einarspetz 13:59, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Leaning in on the right. Mattbuck 19:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC) - Decline Support Good light and composition.--Peulle 13:32, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Oppose per Mattbuck and chromatic aberrations --A.Savin 22:56, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Madame Nobel - film set at the Embassy of France in Vienna May 2014 27.jpg
[edit]- Nomination On the film set of "Madame Nobel", Vienna --Tsui 16:04, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
There's too much in this photo which is rather distracting. Sure you have the one pretty girl looking at you, but the rest have their backs turned and then there's the guy with the fag packet.... Mattbuck 23:56, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
So much going on is the point of the picture, a bunch of background actors waiting on the set - with one face towards us as the eye-catcher (and cigarettes aren't really a criterion for exclusion here I think). --Tsui 08:23, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Not sure; one the one hand, the shot shows the activity on the set, on the other hand, there is no real subject at hand. Technically good, a couple of things out of foucs. Leaning toward no.--Peulle 14:09, 5 June 2014 (UTC) - Oppose Too many distracting details. --Till.niermann 11:24, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
File:London MMB «36 City Canal.jpg
[edit]- Nomination City Canal, London. Mattbuck 08:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose too harsh cast shadows, and problematic crop imo --A.Savin 10:31, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
I'd like another opinion please. --Mattbuck 19:47, 4 June 2014 (UTC) - Oppose Problematic crop; the ships should be the main focus and as it is, two are cropped out. Otherwise good quality.--Peulle 11:00, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- It wasn't an option really, as then I'd just have the same problem with the ships behind those. Mattbuck 22:28, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Can you bright a bit the shadows please? --Christian Ferrer 17:41, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Done Mattbuck 22:32, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Support ok --Christian Ferrer 04:36, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Support QI. --P e z i 18:28, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Support Really can't find any problems with crop or shadows. Good composition with interesting lighting and accetable sharpness. -- Smial 21:52, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Barred Grass Snake (Natrix helvetica), Otmoor, Oxfordshire.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Grass snake (natrix natrix) --Charlesjsharp 20:12, 29 May May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline Subject partly obscured by foreground leaves. --Mattbuck 23:56, 3 June 2014 (UTC) Second opinion please as to whether the reed detracts from the image of a wild animal --Charlesjsharp 16:18, 4 June 2014 (UTC) I think it does, given that one of the reeds is blocking the view of the snake.--Peulle 11:06, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
CommentI like the way the creature's head is framed by that grassy triangle. Could the leftmost third be cropped? --Till.niermann 11:28, 7 June 2014 (UTC) Have cropped to 2x1 rather than 1.5x1. Is that what you are requesting? Can't crop any other way otherwise as some of the snake would be removed. --Charlesjsharp 13:35, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Franziskuskapelle Marburg 02.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Chapel ruin in Marburg. --Hydro 21:17, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --XRay 06:05, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose tilted on right (+perspectives), blown sky at right --Christian Ferrer 11:51, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
- Support Good use of light and the ruin is the main focus of the image.--Peulle 11:14, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose per Christian. --P e z i 14:48, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Overexposed. --Siipikarja 13:03, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
File:30th_St._Moritz_Polo_World_Cup_on_Snow_-_20140202_-_BMW_vs_Deutsche_Bank_3.jpg
[edit]- Nomination 30th St. Moritz Polo World Cup on Snow - 20140202 - BMW vs Deutsche Bank --Pleclown 11:28, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
- Random composition/ --Mattbuck 20:47, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- Comment unconventional but not bad, certainly not distracting enough to decline QI for me unless other more pressing problems are present. The players are following the ball that's visible in the image. --Pitke 01:38, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose The crop is too tight for this composition to work. --Siipikarja 12:59, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
File:2008-05-25 13 45 35 Iceland-Þingvellir.jpg
[edit]- Nomination , Faults in Þingvellir, Iceland-- Photo by User:Simisa --Reykholt 12:36, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support ok --Christian Ferrer 15:35, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose chromatic aberrations on shadows --A.Savin 11:11, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support The CA seems very slight or even nonexistent to me. Jakec 13:45, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support per Jacek. --Cayambe 09:20, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose With only 3 MPix the CA problem should have been dealt with. -- Smial 06:26, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice pic but poor detail and strong chromatic aberration in the lower right on the branches. Today I expect a QIC of only 3 megapixels to be crisp sharp (even if taken 6 years ago). --Kreuzschnabel 16:22, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose chromatic aberration. --Siipikarja 11:16, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → More votes? --Cayambe 09:20, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Core_Banks_-_Green_Anole_-_1.JPG
[edit]- Nomination Animals of Core Banks, North Carolina: Carolina anole (Anolis carolinensis) --Jarekt 18:15, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Cayambe 15:45, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Detail lost due to channel overexposure. --Mattbuck 21:30, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose per Mattbuck, plus tip of tail cut off. --Kreuzschnabel 16:27, 8 June 2014 (UTC)