User talk:Pko

Note: If you want me answer quickly, better contact me in English by my discussion page on Polish Wikipedia: pl:Dyskusja Wikipedysty:Pko.

Thanks a lot for helping to index the Russian Empire pictures.--Eloquence

Image:Gdansk sztych ok 1628.jpg

Hi, you wrote that this is an etching. Are you quite certain it is not an engraving? Thuresson 06:53, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your answer. I assume that the german word "stich" has something to do with Kupferstich which is the same as Miedzioryt. Hence this is not an etching but an engraving. Thuresson 23:46, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Image:P2280181.JPG

Nice pictures! But I think this one is a duplicate.

When you mark duplicate for deletion, please give a link to the other image. Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 01:43, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

kościół mariacki

Nie ma za co, staram się w miarę regularnie przeglądać kategorię:Kraków. A co do tytułu artykułu, to osobiście byłabym za St. Mary church in Krakow, a tu: Kościół Mariacki w Krakowie stworzyć redirect. Cancre 18:12, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Przeniosłam do St. Mary's church in Kraków (zadecydowała większa liczba trafień w googlach, czyli ta forma jest popularniejsza :-), zrobiłam też redirect (Kościół Mariacki w Krakowie). Pzdr Cancre 18:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Kategoryzacja zdjęć zwierząt

Jeśli nie zauważyłeś zdjęcia zwierząt są umieszczane w galeriach i to te galerie sa kategoryzowane. Po kiego grzyba dodałeś kategorie do grafiki Image:Craesus septentrionalis1.jpg (o utworzeniu kategorii dublującej galerię nie wspomne) Nemo5576 18:44, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, ale robisz bałagan, i nie wiem czemu to ma słuzyć. Nemo5576 19:27, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Właśnie doczytałem. Na Commons jest koszmarny bałagan. Z jednej strony na Commons:Pierwsze kroki piszą uwaga: kategoria powinna być dodana do artykułu, nie do strony pliku, a tu wymagają żeby kategoryzować pliki :( W category:Firearms mam ten sam problem. Co pousuwam kategorie plikom umieszczonym w galeriach to zaraz jakiś bystrzak mnie rewertuje i ciągle mam bałagan. Zainteresowany jestem, ale moja znajomość angielskiego jest delikatnie mówiąc nędzna i w dyskusjach na commons nie uczestnicze. Moim zdaniem galerie i kategorie powinny być traktowane co najmniej równorzędnie (tzn. grafika musi być albo w galerii albo w kategorii) Nemo5576 19:52, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Tyle tylko ze w galerie moge sobie podzielić na kilka części (np. tak jak w M16 czy M60) czy dodać opisy pod grafikami. W kategorii najczęściej jest bałagan bo grafiki ułozone są alfabetycznie. Nie mówie juz o takim drobiazgu że zmiany w kilkudziesięciu galeriach w jednej kategorii moge sprawdzić jednym kliknieciem, a zmiany w kilkudziesięciu podkategoriach kilkudziesięcioma (a sprwdzać trzeba bo ludzie potrafią różne cuda robić [1]). Galerie mają jedną wade. Faktycznie trzeba o nie dbać. Nemo5576 20:34, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

No i "aktualność" zaleceń, oraz "łatwość" z jaką porozumiewa się róznojęzyczny tłum na Commons powoduje ze ja uprawiam swoją partyzantkę po cichu i bez ogladania się na innych :) Może to i egoistyczne, ale jak na razie nikt mi zbytnio nie przeszkadza. Nemo5576 21:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Quality images promotion

Hi, thank you for your good work on Quality images. However, I noticed that you've just moved pictures that I reviewed more than two days agor from Commons:Quality images candidates to Commons:Quality images. I think you should allow at least 2 day after the review of an image before either promote it or discard it. This is because in some cases, there is a need for consensual review. This shouldn't be too much of an issue on the images you've just promoted, but please make sure to observe this grace period next time.

But again, thank you for your very good work! CyrilB 16:00, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for kind words. I recognize the possibility of consensual review and didn't intend to move the pictures before 2 days passed from review. According to the guidelines, grace period is 2 days (48 hours), and the last picture I moved was reviewed at 29 Sep, 13:57 by Gnangarra [2], which means that 48-hour period had passed (admittedly only less than hour, but still). Or maybe different time zones have some meaning here, what should be taken into consideration. Anyway, believe me that I wanted to do everything according to rules. Pko 17:25, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

I should have given more details. Actually, it appears that you have added Image:Papilio demoleus butterfly.jpg to Commons:Quality images (this is why i originally sent you this message, as I reviewed this image today), but you haven't removed it from Commons:Quality images candidates (I suppose this is an error). I have nothing to say about the other images, and I won't bother you for 1 hour out of 48! CyrilB 18:00, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Quality Image

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle on an island, Tropea, Italy, Sep 2005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

-- Alvesgaspar 11:19, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Quality image

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Szydlowiec church town hall edited.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Alvesgaspar 08:13, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Quality Image

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torun SS Johns Mary Magdalene.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Alvesgaspar 11:56, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:466px-Stanisław_Kostka_Potocki_-_grobowiec.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:466px-Stanisław_Kostka_Potocki_-_grobowiec.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 11:20, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Grudziadz kosciol pojezuicki wn.jpg

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:59, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Torun herb SP1.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Please help replace this outdated license

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

• File:Torun-sw-Katarzyny.jpg

BotMultichillT 21:02, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Torun Baszta Wartownia.jpg

---

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

• Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
• State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
• If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
• Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
• Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:54, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torun clinic at Uniwersytecka Str (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The image is very good as it is, but the lens flare could be eliminated. --Ianare 04:16, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wloclawek katedra 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments -- A bit soft but very good nevertheless. What is that guy doing?... -- Alvesgaspar 17:57, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torun Dwor Mieszczanski 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments yes for me --Jebulon 16:35, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

CC-BY-2.5,2.0,1.0

Hi Pko, I see a lot of your images in Category:CC-BY-2.5,2.0,1.0 (for example File:Torun dw wschodni.jpg). Would you be willing to change the license from {{Cc-by-2.5,2.0,1.0}} to {{Cc-by-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}? My bot can do that for you, Multichill (talk) 13:26, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Yes, please change the licence where needed. Thanks. Pko (talk) 17:19, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Ok. Great. I'll update your images. Multichill (talk) 20:28, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Quadripartite_rib_vault-scheme.png

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Quadripartite_rib_vault-scheme.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Quadripartite_rib_vault-scheme.png]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:00, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Zdjecie lodowiska w Toruniu

Czesc, widzę że wykonywałeś zdjęcia w Toruniu. Czy dałbyś rade wykonać zdjęcie lodowiska w Toruniu, gdyż brakuje w commons? Znajduje się przy ul. św. Józefa 26. --Lowdown (talk) 08:56, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

• Zapewne masz rację. Ale chodzi mi tu o walor dokumentacyjny. Dotyczy to choćby artykułu o aktualnym sezonie Polskiej Ligi Hokejowej. W artykule na Wikipedii http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ekstraliga_polska_w_hokeju_na_lodzie_(2011/2012) brak jest trzech widoków lodowisk klubów, w tym z Torunia. Z tego względu zasugerowałem Abyś wykonał takie zdjęcia. Jeśli nie jest to duży problem to prosiłbym o wykonanie. Pozdrawiam --Lowdown (talk) 14:56, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

• Aha, w takim razie zaszło chyba nieporozumienie. Jakiś czas temu napisałeś o jakimś lodowisku, zrozumiałem, że chodzi o Tor-Tor i dzisiaj wykonałem odpowiednie zdjęcia. Potem jeszcze raz przeczytałem Twoją wiadomość, w której właściwie była mowa lodowisku na Św. Józefa (tak naprawdę przy Szosie Chełmińskiej), które jest czysto rekreacyjne i nie ma większego znaczenia. Teraz widzę, że w artykule, na który się powołujesz, jest wymienione tylko lodowisko Tor-Tor, przy ul. Bema, czyli w sumie dobrze zrozumiałem. Trochę to zagmatwane, w każdym razie zdjęcie już umieściłem na Commons: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Torun,_Poland,_Tor-Tor_skating_rink.jpg Pko (talk) 15:35, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Pko!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 13:16, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Torun wozownia ul Rabianska 20.jpg was uncategorized on 31 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:16, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Torun piekarnia wojskowa, ul. Dominikanska.jpg was uncategorized on 31 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:16, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Torun cmentarz ul Poznanska kaplica Jaugsch.jpg was uncategorized on 31 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:16, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. odder (talk) 18:37, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Dzień dobry, Chciałam się zapytać, czy mogę użyć Twojego zdjęcia panorama Torunia jako tło na profil ogłoszeniowy na koncie Google+ i FB? Wiem, że licencja Wikipedii zezwala na uzycie, ale chciałam być fair wobec Ciebie. Czekam na odpowiedź - kapusta.ag@gmail.com Aknieszkaa (talk) 16:29, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Pytanie

Ładne zdjęcie toruńskiej poczty z 17 kwietnia:) P.S. Masz może zdjęcia (ładne):) toruńskich banków?--Mateuszgdynia (talk) 18:41, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Kosciol Mariacki w Krakowie.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kosciol Mariacki w Krakowie.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Kosciol na Skalce-Oltarz.jpg
• File:Krakow-ratusz2.jpg
• File:Mogilno domy na rynku.jpg

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Torun las skarpa.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Torun las skarpa.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Torun zamek Dybow brama.jpg
• File:Torun zamek Dybow pn.jpg

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Kosciol na Skalce-Front.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kosciol na Skalce-Front.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Mogilno kosciol farny od pd.jpg

Yours sincerely, JuTa 06:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Permission to use figure in a book.

Dear Pko,

I am working with Prof. Steven LaValle to help obtain permissions for borrowing figures or pictures in his upcoming book Virtual Reality, to be published by Cambridge University Press. The book is online here:

http://vr.cs.uiuc.edu/

We are hoping to include the picture of yours : (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e8/Fresnel_lens.svg/161px-Fresnel_lens.svg.png)

 in this book (Chapter 7, Figure 7.14 ).  Could we please have your permission for this?  Thank you.

Please contact me at awarkoczewski@yahoo.com

Sincerely,

Adam Warkoczewski — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.8.89.124 (talk) 13:19, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Nowe wersje zdjęć

Cześć, dodając nowe wersje zdjęć podawaj proszę w polu Autor szablonu opisu siebie jako autora tej nowej wersji. Obecnie opis podaje tylko autora źródła, co jest mylące, np. tu: File:Staszów Kościół św. Bartłomieja 3 ed.jpg. Można wpisywać np.: "Original work: Nova, derivative work: Pko." Pozdrawiam, Nova (talk) 17:11, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Pko,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Pko,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Pko,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Category:St._Mary's_Castle_Church

Category:St._Mary's_Castle_Church has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Jonteemil (talk) 07:22, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Massopust.jpg

Hi, the page image File:Massopust.jpg belongs to the Massopust 1580 category, which is all in the 1580 books category. It is also image of the the cover page of this book, so it also belongs to the 1580 book covers category. Thank you for understanding. Gampe (talk) 03:31, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

But this is not a book cover, it is a title page. Please see the relevant article. Adding files to improperly named categories creates mess and makes other files harder to find. I propose to create category Category:1580 books title pages and put the file there. Pko (talk) 10:19, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Carbon cycle-cute diagram

hi, you uploaded a new version of File:Carbon cycle-cute diagram.svg
Did you not read the warning at file-description? not to use svg-translator tool? you ruined the svg-code --Mrmw (talk) 12:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

There is no need to be aggressive. I reverted the file to the previous version. Pko (talk) 20:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)